A review is a text that summarizes the content of a work or event. It selects the most significant of the document, exposes its main ideas, the purpose of the text and its purpose, as well as all the complementary aspects to the text, from the author's point of view.
As a general rule, reviews are usually descriptive, since they report the content without establishing value judgments or conclusions on the part of the author. They can also be critical if the author's judgments are included in it. A good critical writer must avoid favoritism or arbitrariness, must formulate fair value judgments, which provoke reflection and that are based on their knowledge of the subject.
The review is a text that introduces or presents the subject under consideration, to invite the reader to read it. The review includes the development or analysis of the topic, the exposition of the arguments, whether in favor or against, refuting the contrary to the topic that is exposed..
For this, it is helped by examples, data, testimonials, etc. In the conclusion, the reaffirmation of the thesis is also added and its consequences are extracted.
There are several types of review depending on the scope. They can be bibliographical or literary when they deal with books; of cinema or television, if they deal with films, series or television programs; of events and shows, if the reviews deal with plays and concerts; they can also be sports, when they deal with games, teams, etc .; Politics; etc.
To start with a review, it is essential to identify what work we are referring to. It is necessary to include the essential bibliographic data of the title or article.
The reader has to know exactly what work he is referring to at all times. The review must be based on a single work, and not mix it with others, even if they are similar.
It is one of the important parts of the review, you have to present the work to the reader so that they are interested in it.
In short, a good review writer must be able to convey the essential features of the work he is dealing with..
In the review you have to glimpse the structure that follows the work you are talking about.
If the work is divided into chapters or sections, what is the narrative focus that the author takes throughout the work, etc.
A review must perfectly summarize the content of the work we are analyzing, include the most important points.
If it is a critical review, the content should first be described impartially and then the review author's judgments should be published. But the description of the content of the review always has to be neutral.
You have to summarize the texts that are published in the work in a way that explains the main idea of the author, not just the texts that are included and on which the work is based.
It is important to develop it properly, so that the reader has an idea of what to expect and what will be found in the work reviewed..
The theoretical background about the work is usually shown, where everyone who is portrayed within the work is shown.
When an author makes a criticism in his review, it must be based on valid and truthful arguments. For this, it must be supported by other theories and knowledge on the subject.
You can include theories of other authors to make the necessary comparisons to support your criticism.
The criticism has to be constructive and contribute something to the subject, it has to be based on verifiable facts so that the reader knows all the possible information.
In a review it is important to include a conclusion of the work, a small summary of what has been related previously, the points that can be found in favor and against it, so that the reader understands the end of the work that he wants to read.
The review should always recommend reading the work that is being reviewed. Even if the author of the review is contrary to what is published in the work, he must recommend to the readers its reading for contrast and that they formulate their own conclusions.
It is not correct for a review to indicate that a work is bad and that it should not be read, the review has to be impartial and based on demonstrable value judgments and in which readers can decide their own opinion about the work.
It is important that the image of the author of the work is portrayed in a review. Know what your field of study is, or your life experience, know what led you to make those conclusions and what is based or supported to carry out that work.
It is also good to know who are predecessors and masters of the field, to know what feature of the theory is in their field of action
It is important that the author of a review signs it and that they are not done anonymously.
If a review is made and it is well supported and substantiated, there should be no problem with displaying the name of the person who made that review.
It is not correct for someone to make a critical review of a work anonymously, since that discredits the veracity and validity of the review in question.
Yet No Comments