A simpleiomorphy, in cladist terminology, it refers to an ancestral character shared by two or more taxa. That is, this characteristic coincides with the one inferred that it was present in the common ancestor of both groups..
Simpleiomorphies are types of plesiomorphies, which are defined as ancestral characters. This term is opposed to apormorphy - derived characters or evolutionary novelties. In the same way, the term simplesiomorphy is opposed to synapomorphy - a shared derived character..
According to the cladistic classification school, ancestral derived characters should not be used to define groups, as it would result in a paraphyletic grouping.
Article index
In cladism, a polarity is attributed to the different characteristics present in organic beings. Thus, there are derived characters and ancestral characters. The first of these is known as apomorphic, while the ancestral state is called plesiomorphic..
If more than one taxon presents the ancestral state, the character is a simpleiomorphy - because it is shared. Similarly, shared derived features are synapomorphies.
These terms are of relative use and depend on the "position" or depth of the phylogenetic tree that the reader is taking..
For example, in the division between mandibulated and non-mandibulated, the lack of structure represents the ancestral character, while the presence of mandibles is considered derivative. But, if I am comparing two groups of mammals, for example cats and dogs, the jaw will be an ancestral character..
Reading phylogenetic trees is subject to a number of misunderstandings. Among the most common is to assume that said graphic representation provides information about the primitive or advanced state of the species that are represented there..
In this way, phylogenetic trees provide us with information about the evolutionary history of organic beings, focusing on the characters. That is, it cannot tell us if a species is ancestral or derived, but if we can infer these states of the character in question.
For example, imagine that we can sequence amino acids in a protein that is present in gorilla, bonobo, chimpanzee, and human. In this hypothetical sequence, all the organisms mentioned have the amino acid residue valine, while the chimpanzee has glutamic acid instead..
In that case, we could assume that the most possible hypothesis - following the principle of parsimony, also called Occam's razor, which requires the least number of evolutionary changes - is that valine is the ancestral trait and that everyone has inherited them from yet. common ancestor. However, in chimpanzees the character changed.
An almost universal method for the differentiation between both states of the character is the comparison with an external group, following the following principle: if different states of a characteristic appear in two groups, it is highly probable that the manifestation found in its closest relative, is the ancestral.
In cladism, phylogenetic relationships are deduced using strictly synapomorphies or shared derived characters.
The use of this characteristic leads to the formation of monophyletic groupings - the common ancestor of the group, plus everyone their descendants. The resulting phylogenetic hypothesis is expressed in a graph called a cladogram..
If we wanted to establish groupings using simpleiomorphies, the result would be paraphyletic. Take for example reptiles and winged and wingless insects
Scaly skin is an ancestral feature shared by turtles, crocodiles, lizards, and the like. The scales contributed to misunderstandings in taxonomy for centuries. Today, the fossil, molecular and morphological evidence has led to the conclusion that reptiles do not form a clade (a monophyletic group).
Why are reptiles paraphyletic? Because crocodiles are more related to birds, than to snakes and lizards, for example. Following this line of thought, it is more than clear that birds are part of the clade of reptiles.
In insects, we can establish a very intuitive division between the representatives that do not have wings and those that do - in Apterygota and Pterygota respectively.
In the course of evolution, insects, which previously did not possess wings, developed these structures. Therefore, not having wings is an ancestral character, while wings represent the derived state..
These two groups have no taxonomic validity. Apterygota represents a paraphyletic group, as it is based on a shared ancestral characteristic: the absence of wings..
As in reptiles, there are wingless insects that are more related to winged variants than other wingless species..
These examples clearly illustrate how the use of shared derived characters provides us with evidence of real kinship relationships, while the use of simpleiomorphies does not..
The paraphyletic group of the "prochordates" is made up of hemicordates, urochordates and cephalochords. These organisms are classified by the presence of primitive characters.
If you want to form a monophyletic grouping, you have to take into account apomorphic characters, which clearly unify urochordates, cephalochordates and vertebrates. These form the clade of the chordates.
Hemichordates are characterized by the presence of a stomochord, which was long believed to resemble a real notochord, but current evidence has made it clear that it is not. In addition, they have gill slits and a dorsal nerve cord.
In contrast, chordates are characterized by a notochord, a hollow dorsal nerve cord, and gill slits. These characteristics may change throughout the individual's life, but remain diagnostic of the group..
Monotremes have an interesting mix of plesiomorphic characteristics, reminiscent of reptiles, and apomorphic, typical of mammals. However, these organisms are strongly adapted to a semi-aquatic or ant-consuming lifestyle, which makes analysis of the characters difficult..
For example, the skull of the members of the group exhibits plesiomorphic characteristics, but they differ in the morphology of the beak. The snout features a long bone found in reptiles, therapsids, and xenarthras. The ventral surface of the skull has structures that could be remnants of reptilian characteristics.
Yet No Comments