The values are qualities or attributes considered positive, necessary and desirable that human beings assign to objects and other human beings. They are characterized by being associated with the idea of "good" or by being useful for individual and social life.
The antivalues, for his part, they are also attributes that are assigned to objects and people, with the exception that these represent something negative, unnecessary or undesirable, that is, they are associated with the idea of "bad." In this way, the antivalues are the counterpart of the values. When an antivalue manifests itself in a subject or object, it implies an evil for something or someone.
| Values | Antivalues | |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | They are attributes seen as positive and desirable that are assigned to objects and subjects. | They are attributes seen as negative and undesirable that are assigned to objects and subjects. |
| Characteristics |
|
|
| Example | If there is equity in a company, its workers receive a salary or remuneration according to the work performed, regardless of their gender or sex.. | In a company where there is inequity, men receive a higher salary or remuneration than women, despite the fact that they all do the same type of work. |
In general terms, values are qualities attributed to objects that humans see as positive, necessary and / or desirable.
Thus, a large majority of values are based on subjective motivations, on the positive or practical result implied by possessing certain qualities, associated with the idea of the "good" or the "useful".
The values themselves they are not a material object, rather, they are attributes that can satisfy a need or desire, assigned by people to something or subject. That is, a value is a quality that someone perceives in a subject or object, be it material or ideal (such as the idea of beauty).
Values (and antivalues) as attributes are a way of ascribing qualities to something or someone. To say that a person is "good" or that stealing is "bad" is to attribute a value. Thus, the values are expressed in a predicative way.
This is why many thinkers point out that both values and anti-values are based on a subjective perspective rather than on the objects or people to whom they are attributed..
In the same way, values are not always equivalent to ethical precepts or moral ideals. Even if there are moral values, there are also values that are related to economic processes, such as the use value of an object, or also aesthetic values related to the idea of beauty when contemplating a work of art..
It is common for values to be viewed as innate qualities in the human being. In this way, freedom, for example, is thought of as a value that each person possesses. Likewise, the values are understood as behavior guides for human beings. In this case, values such as honesty are a way of acting that people are expected to have, for the social good..
In the field of ethics there are debates about the nature of values, in particular it is questioned whether values are human constructions or whether, instead, they exist outside the social world.
Those who claim that values are objectives, claim that these they exist by themselves, regardless of whether people perceive or experience them in the world or not. Also, these are outside and do not depend on objects or subjects in which they are manifested. An example of objective value is life, if it is thought to exist on its own, regardless of whether anyone sees it as a value..
In the case of subjective values, These are characterized because they are relative, depend on who experiences them and are something that is desired or seen as necessary. Its subjectivity is due to the fact that they are human creations and do not exist outside of people. In this case, if there were no humans or intelligent beings who considered values to exist, then there would be no values..
Some thinkers claim that values are instrumental. That is, the values "are worth" because through these an end is obtained. If health is thought of as an instrumental value, since being healthy allows people to carry out different activities, this is seen as a means to an end.
The intrinsic values are those that are worth by themselves. These values are the "ends" and their quality of value exists outside of people. They differ from instrumental values in that they are not a means of obtaining something.
For example, performing a good deed, as an end in itself, without expecting anything in return in all honesty, is considered an intrinsic value. Pleasure, happiness, health, etc., when they are not desired as means to obtain something beyond themselves, are also intrinsic values.
In the axiology or study of values, One of the best known classifications of values is that of the German philosopher Max Scheler (1874-1928), in which values and antivalues are objective and can be hierarchically ordered.
According to Scheler, the values are independent of the objects to which they are attributed and they exist a priori (before experiencing reality). That is, the essence of beauty, goodness or nobility already exists, and experience simply allows these to be felt in different objects or people..
Another characteristic of values is that these they are polar, so each one has a counterpart. That is, for each value, there is an equivalent antivalue.
In addition to this, Scheler orders the values, giving greater importance to the values associated with the mind and the holy, while the material and physical values are in a lower plane of his hierarchy..
Thus, both values and anti-values, according to this philosopher, can be classified into four categories:
Values have been talked about and meditated on for millennia and from different currents of thought. However, the study of values took on particular relevance during the development of classical economics..
In the 18th century, economists such as Adam Smith (1723-1790), David Ricardo (1772-1823) and others associated the idea of "value" with economic processes in the production of goods..
For the Scottish economist Adam smith, the value of an object is related to the cost of its production and marketing. In the labor theory of value, work plays a fundamental role in determining the value of a commodity. This is because producing something always involves the completion of work.
Likewise, the work employed is a constant, unlike the price that the good may have in the market (which is variable).
The English economist David ricardo agreed with Adam Smith, stating that the job used in production is a form of measure the value of a good. However, he noted that shortage of a good could also determine its value, regardless of the work it took to produce it.
The use value is the utility that the asset possesses or is made from it.. In this case, the value of a good comes from those needs or uses that people satisfy with it. This value is proper to the good and depends on its characteristics and what it can be used for. Its use and the value derived from it depend on each person or society, so it is a qualitative value.
For his part, the exchange value is the value that results from the exchange of a good for money and / or that allows the acquisition of other goods. The exchange value of a good is linked to the work used to produce or obtain it. This value it is quantitative, since money (or goods) can be measured during the exchange.
You may be interested in seeing 11 examples of essential moral values.
The antivalues, basically, they are the opposites of values. If a value is a positive, desirable, and necessary quality attributed to an object or person, a antivalue is defined as a negative, undesirable and unnecessary quality that is attributed to an object or person.
An antivalue is understood as something that is not desirable, because its presence leads to negative results. For example, ineffectiveness can be seen as an anti-value because it implies the non-realization of an expected result. If a company has certain objectives and the workers are ineffective, the objectives will not be achieved. Hence, an antivalue is undesirable, does not generate utility and is unnecessary.
In addition, antivalues represent a antithesis (opposition) of what values achieve socially. Anti-values such as slavery destroy the harmony of social life, if freedom is seen as a human value (and right). In a society where there is slavery, for example, there is also an anti-value such as injustice. In that case, they are anti-values in a moral sense..
See also:
Yet No Comments