The types of reviews The main ones are the critical, literary or narrative, comparative, mapping, mixed, panoramic, avant-garde, systemic and general review. The review is a text of variable length in which information that has already been published is discussed.
Reviews can be made on a single text, on several texts by the same author, on several texts on the same subject, on several texts from the same historical period, among others..
Sometimes reviews follow the pattern of a synopsis; This means that they offer a short introduction to the work reviewed without going into the details of the development and the conclusion..
Other types of reviews are like summaries and offer concise information about each of the parts of the reviewed work, including the conclusion.
A third type of reviews follows the structure of the synthesis that, unlike summaries, reorganizes, analyzes and criticizes the information presented..
In this type of reviews, new interpretations of different texts are offered, different points of view are combined, the evolution or absence of evolution that occurs in a specific area of knowledge is evaluated.
The latter type of reviews evaluate sources. This is why the author of the review sometimes advises readers as to whether the reviewed text is pertinent or relevant..
In this sense, reviews are beneficial to individuals who have limited time to conduct research. They are also of benefit to professionals, since it allows them to keep up-to-date.
The critical review aims to critically analyze the reviewed work. Therefore, this type of review shows that the writer of the review has carried out intensive research with respect to the reviewed work..
Not only has it been limited to summarizing and describing it, but it also includes different degrees of analysis, evaluates the quality of the work, correctly integrates the opinions of various authors and innovates conceptually..
Critical reviews differ from essays and other research because they do not seek to develop a new argument, but rather to discuss, synthesize, analyze and summarize the information offered by other sources..
On the contrary, investigations offer new bits of information and sometimes include reviews of other texts..
The critical review assesses the way in which the author addresses his audience, the appropriateness of the language used, the context in which the work is immersed and the approach taken by the author.
In this sense, critical review is beneficial as it provides an opportunity to assess the value of a written text..
Literary reviews are texts that are intended to evaluate literary texts. These are usually recent texts.
The literary review usually establishes points of comparison. For example: compare the current work of the author with one of his previous works or compare the reviewed work with another contemporary work or with a similar theme.
Contrary to what many might think, the literary review should not be based on the point of view of the person reviewing, but should be an objective text in which the work, its context and its relationship with the work are critically analyzed. Author; otherwise it will be an opinion piece.
The comparative review can be a literary or critical review in which two or more texts are analyzed and synthesized.
This type of review aims to classify and categorize existing texts into groups, by topic, by year of publication, by historical context, by country of origin, by author, among others..
It is a type of review both quantitative and qualitative. Includes descriptive and expository texts, as well as graphs and tables to facilitate understanding of the categories.
Systematic mapping offers advantages to researchers because it allows the works to be classified within specific contexts, which would facilitate the development of future works..
However, this type of review is really simple and lacks the analysis that characterizes other types of reviews, so it is usually used as a support for further research and not as a final work..
Mixed review refers to any review that combines various methods of reviewing or obtaining information.
In general, one of the review methods used is literary, which was mentioned above. Other methods included are interviews and statistics.
In this sense, the mixed review integrates qualitative and quantitative methods. Therefore, it includes descriptive and expository texts, as well as tables and graphs..
The panoramic review, also called “overview” is a generic term that is used to talk about summaries about texts written in a certain area..
In general, an overview is called an overview of medical texts. This type of review allows a quick understanding of the text and is valuable for people who are approaching the subject for the first time.
This type of review refers to current issues, usually contemporary technological advances.
Can offer diverse perspectives on the topic, highlight issues of importance, and lay the foundation for further study.
In this sense, this type of review is important for people seeking to identify the potential of the research that is currently being carried out..
The systematic review is one of the most common types of reviews. This is the result of a systematic research and synthesis process; integrates more than a single text, thus offering compelling evidence.
The overview is a compilation of evidence from multiple sources on a specific topic.
It focuses on the general aspects of the topic at hand and highlights important advances. This type of review can refer not only to the material offered by other research but also to the results offered by other reviews.
Yet No Comments